The Subprime mortgage problem is believed to have started as
early as the year 2001, but just didn’t catch up with the market until August
of 2007. It is believed that it can go back to this year as this is when the
Federal Reserve lowered the interest rate to 1%, which was the lowest in years.
This encouraged many buyers to take out large mortgages to fund the “American
Dream” and purchase a home to call their own, but just how costly it would
prove to be for them no one could predict. They believed that they would be
able to benefit from the low interest rates and that house prices would always
rise, and never fall. The graph below shows how the prices have risen since
1990 until 2007 and then when the markets realised what was happening there was
a dramatic deterioration in prices.
Figure 1 Median U.S. Home Price: 1990–2008
Source: Federal Reserve System
The loans that were affected the most were the variable
mortgagees based on short term interest rates, which enticed borrowers with
their initial very low interest rates, which were highly responsive to Federal
Reserve policy. Prime mortgages went to the better off, and sub-prime mortgages
to people who had never qualified for a mortgage before. Banks were writing mortgages for customers who
previously would have been classified as being at a high risk of not repaying
with poor credit ratings. Surely this was not practical as the smallest of
change in the interest rate would indicate these customers would be unable to
keep up with the payments. This was exactly what happened and by the time
interest rates were starting to raise in 2004 many borrowers were unable to
repay their loans. When it got to the stage when borrowers were unable to keep
up with their mortgage repayments an alarming number of homes were repossessed
causing the property bubble to burst, which caused the large fall in house
prices.
Behind the scenes the banks were involved in dealings that
no one else knew of. The US banks were parcelling together different types of
mortgages and selling them off to investors. These parcels were notoriously
known for paying a high rate of return at a time of low interest rates which
was very appealing to large investors. The real problem with the way they were
being securitised was that respected names were endorsing these loans so no one
questioned the quality of the packages, but in reality Sub-prime mortgages were
being disguised as first class assets.
The ratings agencies had a huge part to play in the
sub-prime mortgage events because of the ridiculously high ratings that many of
the parcels were receiving, and when they finally decided a dose of reality was
needed they issued downgrades for sub-prime linked debt. This had to be done,
but it brought to light even greater debts that anyone could have imagined and
highlighted just how toxic some of the securitised parcels were and this is
when the panic began as no one wanted to be left with the parcels.
In my next post I will be looking at who lost out throughout
the crisis.
No comments:
Post a Comment